Completed Research Project
Identifying and addressing education needs for patients undergoing
percutaneous coronary interventions as a short stay procedure
Investigators:Â Young, J., McCavana, C., Nikoletti,
S., & Sheehan,
M.
Funding: ECU-Industry Collaboration Scheme ($20,446) & WA
Nurses Memorial Charitable Trust ($2,000).
Abstract: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the major cause
of cardiovascular disease worldwide, accounting for one third of
annual mortality in both men and women. One major problem with providing
education to patients with this condition is their limited in-patient
stay, which is primarily due to the use of less invasive diagnostic
and therapeutic procedures, such as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
(PCI). The purpose of this study was to identify and address the
educational needs of patients undergoing PCI as a short stay procedure. The
project consisted of three stages: (1) identification of information
needs and the extent to which these had been met; (2) development
of an improved information needs assessment tool, and educational
resources; and (3a) to evaluate the improved assessment and educational
resources in relation to content and delivery; and (3b) to identify
the educational needs and unmet needs of patients undergoing PCI
as a short stay procedure and compare the types and percentage of
selected information needs with those for Stage 1. The study used
a cross sectional research design conducted in three stages over
24 months, with a convenience sample of 223 PCI patients (n=95 Stage
1; n=128 Stage 3) who were undergoing PCI as a short stay procedure
at SCGH. All patients were 18 years or older and able to read and
understand English. Seventy-four cardiac catheter (CC) patients completed
a telephone interview or questionnaire and 21 angioplasty patients
returned completed questionnaires for Stage 1. Ages ranged from 22
to 82 years (M=63 years). Results showed that although CC patients
acknowledged receiving information on how to recover from their procedure,
more information on exercise, coronary artery disease and risk factors
was requested. Angioplasty patients’ discharge information requests
were primarily for information on appropriate exercise regimens.
In Stage 2 of the study, the development of the clinical assessment
tool and improved educational resources were guided by results obtained
in Stage 1 of the study. The resources were also pilot tested prior
to dissemination. In Stage 3 the sample consisted of 128 participants,
the majority (n= 105) of whom underwent cardiac catheterisation.
The mean age for both groups was 64 years (SD=10). The majority of
angioplasty patients stated that they were given enough information
with regard to pathophysiology, side effects, and procedural information
(94-100%), but requested more information on risk factors such as
management of blood pressure and exercise. Fewer CC patients stated
that they had enough information with regard to pathophysiology,
side effects, and procedural information (58- 93%). Additionally,
between 8 to 42% of CC patients requested information on risk factors
for CHD. Angioplasty patients were knowledgeable on CHD risk factors
but less knowledgeable on procedural information. CC patients responded
similarly. Specifically, CC patients incorrectly reported that a
CC procedure would: unblock an artery (35%; n=37); prevent plaque
build-up on the artery wall (19%; n=20); and cure their heart condition
(21%; n=20). In conclusion, short stay PCI patients need to be better
educated to enable them to make appropriate lifestyle choices and
be fully informed about the procedures which they consent to undergo.
Information from this study may assist clinicians to improve the
education given to patients undergoing these short stay procedures.